http://www.catherineomega.com/2008/11/wikipedia-doesnt-have-an-entry-for-gulliable/ A blog by Catherine Winters Wed, 02 Mar 2011 03:23:41 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://www.catherineomega.com/2008/11/wikipedia-doesnt-have-an-entry-for-gulliable/comment-page-1/#comment-55836 *sigh* Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:31:56 +0000 http://www.catherineomega.com/?p=106#comment-55836 I was once told the word gullible doesn't exist in the dictionary. I wish it wasn't true that I went and looked it up, but it is. I'm trying to convince myself that it has a good side, because it means I really trust people. I was once told the word gullible doesn’t exist in the dictionary. I wish it wasn’t true that I went and looked it up, but it is.
I’m trying to convince myself that it has a good side, because it means I really trust people.

]]> http://www.catherineomega.com/2008/11/wikipedia-doesnt-have-an-entry-for-gulliable/comment-page-1/#comment-52394 Catherine Winters Tue, 07 Apr 2009 21:16:45 +0000 http://www.catherineomega.com/?p=106#comment-52394 That... that was <a href="http://xkcd.com/542/" rel="nofollow">the joke</a>, yes. That… that was the joke, yes.

]]> http://www.catherineomega.com/2008/11/wikipedia-doesnt-have-an-entry-for-gulliable/comment-page-1/#comment-46539 Chantal Sun, 30 Nov 2008 11:35:52 +0000 http://www.catherineomega.com/?p=106#comment-46539 Could it be because it's spelled 'gullible'? Could it be because it’s spelled ‘gullible’?

]]>