Omega Point

A blog by Catherine Winters

14 Dec

Sure, we can put a man on the moon, but we can’t put–oh, right.


596px-Apollo_17_Cernan_on_moon

Eugene Cer­nan walks on the moon, Dec 13, 1972

I’m skep­ti­cal of the use­ful­ness of manned space­flight, even as I believe in its long-term neces­sity. (Besides, should it be nec­es­sary for humans to leave Earth, we could get that going on fairly short order. The technology’s straight­for­ward, even if we don’t have inter­plan­e­tary ships today.)

I was born almost a decade after the last time a human stepped foot on the moon. The Apollo pro­gram was Cold War nose-thumbing and sabre-rattling at its most bla­tant. It was a cor­po­rate boon­dog­gle on a scale scarcely seen since. It was a dis­trac­tion from the hor­rors of Viet­nam and from the wan­ing pop­u­lar­ity of two Presidents.

Land­ing on the moon was also the most impres­sive thing humans have ever achieved.

Despite all its flaws, I’ve been a big sup­porter of the space pro­gram for my entire life. Build­ing bet­ter tele­scopes and probes is absolutely nec­es­sary for the same rea­sons the Large Hadron Col­lider is nec­es­sary: because if we don’t seek out knowl­edge about the uni­verse, if we don’t appre­ci­ate it, what the hell is the point?

36 years ago today, Eugene Cer­nan and Har­ri­son Schmitt stepped into their lunar mod­ule and returned home, the last humans to step foot on another world. That’s not appre­ci­at­ing it, guys.


Filed under: History, News, Politics


4 Responses to “Sure, we can put a man on the moon, but we can’t put–oh, right.”

  1. By Catherine Winters on Dec 14, 2009 | Reply

    I find it most telling that I just tagged a post with a pic­ture of a DUDE STANDING ON ANOTHER PLANETOID with “History”.

  2. By AnneDroid on Dec 14, 2009 | Reply

    It is by far, more cost-effective and effi­cient to send probes and bots to the loca­tions about which we wish to learn more.

    If it’s a choice between learn­ing the his­tory of water (and atmos­phere) on Mars via robotic rovers, or a few weeks’ jaunt on the sur­face by a cou­ple of humans, I would advo­cate the mis­sion of knowledge.

    But that I think, points out the fun­da­men­tal prob­lem: with­out pub­lic enthu­si­asm, the cost of either mis­sion may be too steep. A home-grown super­man reach­ing out to dis­tant worlds is far more rous­ing and prop­gan­diz­able than an impor­tant chunk of information.

    Obvi­ously, I have a bias toward more space explo­ration, and I find it sad that the gen­eral sen­ti­ment con­sid­ers it of sec­ondary impor­tance (at best).

    Per­haps one wayto sat­ify both the aver­age TV watcher’s voyueris­tic inter­ests and still attain an impor­tant step toward deeper explo­ration would be con­struct­ing a (semi-) per­ma­nent lunar base.

    In any case, I’ll put my sup­port behind more space explo­ration, even if it is just for PR and photo ops.

    PS:
    As for the “if evac­u­a­tion is nec­es­sary” state­ment, we may not know with enough advance notice that it’s time to do so — and I’m not sure that my gov­ern­ment could agree on a spe­cific solu­tion given a year to do so (and when they do so, it’d prob­a­bly be the wrong choice — but that’s another discussion).

  3. By AnneDroid on Dec 24, 2009 | Reply

    It occurs to me, with the open­ing of the half-billion dol­lar movie Avatar, that the human race has likely spent more money on movies about space than it has on actual space travel.

  4. By Gayle Thornbury on Jan 6, 2010 | Reply

    Hi Cather­ine,
    I just read your June 2009 blog about your injuries and Kelvin Tam. I’ve been going to Kelvin for years — he helps me immensely every time I’ve needed him, so no com­plaints there! I also suf­fer from low mus­cle mass (espe­cially abdomen and back), which I believe has caused most of my lower and upper back, and neck prob­lems over many years. I am only 5’6″, but seem to suf­fer from mus­cles and lig­a­ments that are too short for my body (poor flex­i­bil­ity and stretch­ing is very dif­fi­cult and painful). I just wanted to tell you that besides Kelvin, the one thing that has finally helped me (for the very long term, I am sure) is hot Bikram yoga. It was absolute tor­ture for me at first, as my heart must be weak, and the back strength­ing exer­cises made me want to puke, and I could hardly do them at all, but I saw a very dim light at the end of a tun­nel, and con­tin­ued going (I can some­times do 2 ses­sions a week now — some peo­ple go every day — what­ever!) I’ve had less back and neck pain (almost none) since com­plet­ing a year of the yoga (again, only going once per week, or less!). So I just wanted to sug­gest that to you as an alter­na­tive — I used to run and cycle, but they overde­velop your quads and then your flex­i­bil­ity in your hams and back decreases and it’s all bad, so I’m off run­ning and cycling until I see a dra­matic improve­ment in my flex­i­bil­ity with Bikram (I’ve been going 2.5 yrs, and keep see­ing improve­ment — I plan to go the rest of my life). I go to the Com­mer­cial Drive loca­tion and think they’re great!
    My 2c worth.

Sorry, comments for this entry are closed at this time.