<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Omega Point &#187; Visualization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.catherineomega.com/category/visualization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.catherineomega.com</link>
	<description>A blog by Catherine Winters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 19:50:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Second Life usage graph roundup!</title>
		<link>http://www.catherineomega.com/2007/03/second-life-usage-graph-roundup/</link>
		<comments>http://www.catherineomega.com/2007/03/second-life-usage-graph-roundup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 01:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Catherine Winters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Catherine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Signal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.catherineomega.com/2007/45/second-life-usage-graph-roundup</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found a fascinating* post about Second Life’s much-debated usage numbers over at Social Signal. “That number will likely be over 4.6 million by the time you read this blog post. So what does that actually mean in practical usage terms? Are there 4.6 million regular Second Life users? Well, no.” * Where “fascinating” may [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found a fascinating* post about Second Life’s much-debated usage numbers over at <a href="http://www.socialsignal.com/blog/catherine-winters/second-life-user-statistics">Social Signal</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>“That number will likely be over 4.6 million by the time you read this blog post. So what does that actually mean in practical usage terms? Are there 4.6 million regular Second Life users? Well, no.”</p></blockquote>
<p>* Where “fascinating” may or may not mean “written by me”. <a href="http://www.socialsignal.com/blog/catherine-winters/second-life-user-statistics">Link</a>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.catherineomega.com/2007/03/second-life-usage-graph-roundup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interactivity != better</title>
		<link>http://www.catherineomega.com/2006/12/interactivity-better/</link>
		<comments>http://www.catherineomega.com/2006/12/interactivity-better/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Catherine Winters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.catherineomega.com/2006/24/interactivity-better</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This may be the least effective use of an interactive map infographic ever. It attempts to present information on an important subject, but it’s very difficult to take in due to poor UI and ineffective use of the map itself. Why on earth does this tool use the same icon for identifying a target country [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/interactives/map-world-womenpolitics/">This</a> may be the least effective use of an interactive map infographic ever. It attempts to present information on an important subject, but it’s very difficult to take in due to poor UI and ineffective use of the map itself.</p>
<p>Why on earth does this tool use the same icon for identifying a target country as the button you click on to determine information about the top 10 countries with female political leadership and so on?</p>
<p>If I click on a country name, shouldn’t I be able to see it highlighted? Doesn’t it make sense to see how regions are ranked? I realize this isn’t a university mapping textbook, but honestly now.</p>
<p>When comparing regions, static maps can be far, far more compelling and contain much more relevant information. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:World_homosexuality_laws.PNG">Cases</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurozone#Countries_with_the_euro_as_currency">in</a> <a href="http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/middle_east_and_asia/iraq_ethno_2003.jpg">point</a>. Bad CBC!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.catherineomega.com/2006/12/interactivity-better/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

